Tiebout Was Wrong, But Why?
Yesterday, I delivered a plenary address to the Public Choice Society in Nashville on “Tiebout Was Wrong, but Why?” Here are the full slides.
Long story short: The still-popular Tiebout model predicts that – due to competition – local government policies will be highly economically efficient. Yet if you actually look a the world, you will see that local governments perform their core functions – education, housing regulation, and law enforcement – very poorly. Furthermore, the Tiebout model strongly predicts the virtual non-existence of local redistribution, but free public education is a massive counter-example.
To grasp what’s really going on, you must first accept that non-profit competition is far inferior to for-profit competition. The “competition” between local governments is like an academic test that doesn’t count for your grade. It’s better than nothing, but anemic compared to a standard exam where students’ futures are on the line. For details, check out the talk.
The post Tiebout Was Wrong, But Why? appeared first on Bet On It.
Subscribe to Bet On It
Caplan and Candor